non-compete clause

Non-compete clauses: Everything you need to know

Non-compete clauses have become a common feature in many employment contracts, aiming to protect a company’s interests by restricting employees from engaging in certain competitive activities after leaving their position.

However, navigating the complexities of these clauses can be challenging for both employers and employees. In this guide, we’ll delve into the intricacies of non-compete clauses, exploring their enforceability, implications, and practical considerations.

If you’re interested in one particular section, use the links below to navigate straight to it:

Ready to discuss how a non-compete clause can help your organisation? Contact our team today.

What is a non-compete clause?

Non-compete clauses, or non-competition clauses, are a type of restrictive covenant which are often included in employment contracts. These clauses aim to prevent employees from working for a competitor or from setting up their own rival business for a period of time after they leave their employer.

These clauses typically specify a geographic area and time period during which the employee is prohibited from engaging in competitive activities. Employment contracts often include them to safeguard the employer’s investment in training, client relationships, and proprietary information.

Are non-compete clauses enforceable?

Non-compete clauses are subject to legal scrutiny as they are unlawful unless the employer has a legitimate business interest to protect this is to ensure they are reasonable and not overly restrictive. Courts assess the enforceability of these clauses based on various factors, including: 

  • the duration and geographic scope of the restriction; 
  • the nature of the employer’s business; 
  • and the employee’s role within the company. 

In general, non-compete clauses that are narrowly tailored to protect specific business interests are more likely to be enforced. However, the enforceability of non-compete clauses varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. 

In the UK, non-compete clauses are not specifically regulated by statutory provisions within the employment framework. Instead, they are subject to the common law principle of “restraint of trade.” This principle holds that a worker should be free to pursue their trade or profession without undue interference, making any contractual term, such as a non-compete clause, void unless it meets specific criteria.

To ensure that you put the right criteria in place – and thus that your non-compete clauses are enforceable – it is recommended that you consult a specialist solicitor.

What types of business interests can a non-compete protect?

Non-compete clauses are designed to protect various types of business interests, including:

  • Trade secrets and proprietary information: Non-compete clauses can prevent employees from disclosing or using confidential information, such as customer lists, marketing strategies, or product designs, for the benefit of a competitor.
  • Customer relationships: Employers may use non-compete clauses to prevent employees from soliciting or doing business with clients or customers of the company after leaving their employment.
  • Specialised skills or knowledge: Non-compete clauses may be used to prevent employees from using specialised skills or knowledge acquired during their employment to compete against their former employer.
  • Goodwill and reputation: Non-compete clauses can help protect the goodwill and reputation of a business by preventing former employees from engaging in activities that could harm the company’s brand or market position.
  • Team moves: where employees solicit or poach other employees of the current employer to join a new employer.

These interests are crucial components of non-compete clauses in employment contracts and are often specified to safeguard the employer’s assets and competitive advantage. 

What happens if an employee violates a non-compete clause?

Violating a non-compete clause is a breach of a legal contract, which carries significant consequences. If an employee violates a non-compete clause, they may face legal consequences, including:

  • Injunctions: Employers may seek injunctive relief to prevent the employee from engaging in competitive activities in violation of the non-compete agreement. If the clause is deemed reasonable, you can petition the court to uphold its conditions, potentially requiring the employee to terminate their employment with a new competitor or cease operating a competing business.
  • Damages: Employers may pursue damages for any losses suffered as a result of the employee’s breach of the non-compete clause, such as loss of business or damage to the company’s reputation. However, proving actual financial loss can be challenging and may require substantial evidence.
  • Enforcement of the agreement: Courts may enforce the terms of the non-compete agreement by compelling the employee to comply with the restrictions outlined in the contract.
  • Legal fees: In some cases, employees who breach a non-compete clause may be required to pay the employer’s legal fees incurred in enforcing the agreement.

If you require assistance with drafting or enforcing a non-compete agreement, our team at Richard Nelson LLP is here to provide expert guidance and representation. Contact us today to learn more about how we can assist you in safeguarding your interests or protecting your rights in relation to non-compete clauses.

How long do non-compete clauses last?

Non-compete clauses, traditionally, have varied in duration according to the terms negotiated between employers and employees. However, in May 2023, the UK government announced its intention to limit the enforceability of non-compete clauses to three months after the last day of employment; it’s important to note that this is not law as yet and we have no current timeframe given by the government when this change will come into effect.

The duration of non-compete clauses is still determined by the employer, with little input from employees. Negotiations over the duration of such clauses are rare, and the enforceability of lengthy clauses can be challenged in court.

With the proposed three-month limit, the government aims to promote economic flexibility and increase competition. This move is expected to benefit employees by facilitating easier transitions to new opportunities, including joining competing businesses or starting their own ventures. However, for employers, this change presents a dual challenge: while it enables quicker access to talent, it also heightens the risk of losing valuable expertise and client relationships to competitors.

These proposed changes if and when implemented underscore the evolving landscape surrounding non-compete clauses in the UK, emphasising the importance for businesses to adapt their practices in response to regulatory developments and to carefully consider the implications for their talent management strategies.

Crafting a reasonable non-compete clause

Drafting a non-compete clause requires careful consideration of various factors to ensure its enforceability and effectiveness in protecting the legitimate business interests of the employer. 

Here are key considerations:

Specificity of restrictions

The non-compete clause should clearly outline the restricted activities that the employee is prohibited from engaging in after termination of employment. This includes specifying the types of businesses or industries the employee cannot work for or compete with.

Duration and geographic scope

The duration of the non-compete restriction and its geographic scope should be reasonable and proportionate to the legitimate interests of the employer. Overly lengthy or broad restrictions may be deemed unenforceable by courts.

Employee’s role and access to information

The necessity of the non-compete clause should be assessed based on the employee’s role within the company and their access to confidential information, trade secrets, or client relationships. Restrictions should be tailored to the level of risk posed by the employee’s departure.

Negotiation and consideration

Employers should ensure that employees have the opportunity to negotiate the terms of the non-compete clause at the time of employment. Additionally, the employee should receive adequate consideration, such as additional compensation or benefits, in exchange for agreeing to the restriction.

Alternatives and complementary measures

Employers may consider alternative measures, such as longer notice periods or garden leave provisions, to complement the non-compete clause. These measures can provide additional protection for the business while minimising potential risks and costs.

Reasonableness in application

Non-compete clauses should be applied reasonably and proportionately to the circumstances of each employee. Employers should avoid imposing overly restrictive clauses that unduly limit the employee’s ability to pursue their career after leaving the company.

Seek legal advice to ensure that non-compete clauses comply with applicable laws and regulations and are tailored to the specific needs of the business.

Additional considerations

Beyond the basic structure of these types of clauses, there are several factors employers should consider when deciding whether to implement a non-compete clause and what restrictions to include as it might be that other clauses are more suitable. Considerations include:

The stability of the workforce

In industries where the stability of staff is crucial, a non-poaching clause might be necessary. This rule stops employees from luring their coworkers to join the same employer. To make it work, the rule usually focuses on certain seniority levels or groups of employees influenced by the person being restricted. Plus, the person being restricted usually needs to know confidential stuff about the team.

The competitiveness of the industry

In a highly competitive industry, employers may have a stronger justification for a non-compete clause to protect their confidential information and client relationships. For example, a tech startup with a groundbreaking new product might have a more legitimate reason for a non-compete clause compared to a company in a less competitive field.

The severity of the restrictions

Less restrictive clauses, such as non-solicitation clauses that limit soliciting clients or employees, may be more enforceable and better balance the employer’s interests with the employee’s mobility. A non-solicitation clause might prevent a salesperson from directly poaching clients they worked with during their employment, but wouldn’t stop them from taking a job with a competitor entirely.

By considering these factors, employers can craft a more balanced approach that protects their legitimate business interests while fostering a positive work environment.

Non-compete clause challenges and exceptions

Despite their potential benefits, non-compete clauses are not without limitations and challenges. Employees may challenge the enforceability of these clauses on various grounds, such as lack of consideration, unreasonable restrictions, or violation of public policy. 

Courts may also refuse to enforce non-compete clauses if they are found to be overly broad or oppressive, particularly if they prevent employees from pursuing gainful employment in their chosen field.

Additionally, certain exceptions may exist that allow employees to bypass or invalidate non-compete clauses. For example, courts may refuse to enforce a non-compete clause if it imposes an undue hardship on the employee or if the employer has engaged in unlawful conduct. 

Can employees seek redress against non-compete agreements that are deemed unfair?

Employees who believe they are subject to unfair non-compete agreements may seek redress through legal means. This can involve challenging the enforceability of the agreement in court, particularly if the terms are deemed unreasonable or if the agreement violates applicable laws or public policy. 

Legal remedies may include seeking injunctions to prevent enforcement of the non-compete clause or pursuing damages for any harm suffered as a result of its enforcement.

Mitigating the potential impact of non-compete clauses on employee rights

To mitigate the potential impact of non-compete clauses on employee rights, employers and policymakers may consider implementing measures to ensure that such agreements are fair and reasonable. 

This could involve imposing limits on the scope, duration, and geographic reach of non-compete clauses, as well as providing employees with adequate compensation or alternative benefits in exchange for agreeing to these restrictions. 

Additionally, greater transparency and clarity in the drafting and implementation of non-compete agreements can help ensure that employees are fully aware of their rights and obligations.

How can we help

Navigating the intricacies of non-compete clauses requires a nuanced understanding of contract law and employment regulations. 

At Richard Nelson LLP, our team of experienced solicitors for employers specialises in advising businesses on matters related to non-compete clauses. Contact us today to learn more about how we can assist you in safeguarding your interests or protecting your rights in relation to non-compete clauses.


Other articles you may be interest in


A guide for employers in handling stalking and harassment cases

Judicial mediation in employment tribunals

The role of judicial mediation in employment tribunals

Writing an employee privacy notice on a laptop.

A complete guide to Employee Privacy Notices (with examples)

1 of 3
Arrange a call today

Are you an individual or business looking for legal advice and representation?

Speak to a lawyer
  • Award-winning service
  • Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
  • Benchmark for quality